- Home
- About Us
- Our Offices
- Our Services
- Our clients stories
- Working for Us
- Contact Us
- Policy Research
- Save RMJ Campaign
- Briefings
- Strategic Litigation
- Media
- Translated Pages
- Interpreting Translation Services
- Useful Links
- Acknowledgements

Poland occupies a distinctive position in international law enforcement. As a full EU member state, Poland operates within the European Arrest Warrant framework — one of the most efficient extradition mechanisms in the world. Polish courts process EAW requests from dozens of countries, and Polish nationals travelling abroad face reciprocal exposure wherever EU surrender obligations apply. At the same time, Poland actively cooperates with INTERPOL, meaning that a Red Notice or diffusion issued against a Polish national or Poland-connected individual can result in arrest at any international border, without prior warning.
People searching for a Poland-linked lawyer experienced in extradition, INTERPOL law, and cross-border criminal defence are usually already in a serious position. They may have discovered a Red Notice, received notification of proceedings, or encountered travel difficulties suggesting an alert is active. This is not a situation that responds well to generalist advice. What is needed is a lawyer who understands how EAW proceedings, INTERPOL's internal rules, and EU law interact — and who can work across all three at once.
The European Arrest Warrant is binding on all EU member states. Once issued, it bypasses the political stage of traditional extradition and places the matter directly before the courts of the executing country. Polish courts are obliged to consider EAW requests seriously, and grounds for refusal are limited. The process moves quickly, often in weeks rather than months.
In parallel, INTERPOL notices and diffusions function across 195 member countries. A Red Notice does not itself constitute an arrest order, but it creates immediate practical consequences: border detention risk, travel restrictions, frozen accounts, and reputational damage that can precede any judicial process. For someone with regular business travel through Warsaw, Kraków, or any other EU hub, an active INTERPOL alert makes safe movement almost impossible. The EAW and INTERPOL systems are legally separate but practically reinforcing — they can be used simultaneously to maximise pressure on the subject.
Clients sometimes search for official INTERPOL information hoping to understand their status through public channels. It should be stated clearly: Collegium of International Lawyers is an independent specialist law firm — not an official government body, not affiliated with INTERPOL, and not part of any law enforcement authority. The firm provides independent legal representation before INTERPOL's Commission for the Control of Files (CCF), in national courts, and in extradition proceedings.
Challenging a Red Notice or requesting data deletion requires formal legal action — adversarial proceedings with defined procedural rules, evidentiary standards, and deadlines. General criminal counsel rarely has the specific knowledge these submissions demand.
Whether the client is a Polish national at risk abroad, a foreign national facing extradition in a Polish court, or a business person whose travel passes through Poland, the core question is the same: what exposure exists, and how is it managed?
A competent strategy typically requires:
Each step requires specialist knowledge. A firm that handles INTERPOL and extradition matters as a core practice — not occasionally — is better placed to identify the right arguments and execute them effectively.
The practical weight of INTERPOL exposure is illustrated in a case handled by Collegium of International Lawyers. A British citizen became the subject of a Red Notice filed by Kenyan law enforcement, accusing him of complicity in fraud and document forgery connected to the sale and transfer of a cargo aircraft valued at approximately USD 4 million. The Red Notice created detention risk across all INTERPOL member states and effectively ended his ability to travel or conduct international business.
The legal team reviewed the supporting materials and identified critical weaknesses. The notice contained no clear account of the client's personal role in the alleged offences. Contradictory timelines appeared in different documents. The client had no authority to act on behalf of the companies named, and no connection to the aircraft's registration or physical transfer could be established.
When the CCF sought clarification from Kenyan authorities, they failed to provide substantive new evidence. The Commission concluded the data did not comply with INTERPOL's rules on the processing of personal information. The records were deleted from INTERPOL's database, and the client was removed from the international wanted list — no longer subject to detention through INTERPOL channels.
Dr. Anatoliy Yarovyi, Senior Partner at Collegium of International Lawyers, holds a Doctor of Law degree with advanced qualifications from Lviv University and Stanford University. He was a candidate for a judgeship at the European Court of Human Rights and focuses his practice on INTERPOL representation, extradition proceedings, cross-border defence, and international data protection.
For clients whose situation involves Polish courts, EU extradition mechanisms, or INTERPOL-level exposure, Dr. Anatoliy Yarovyi and the team at Collegium of International Lawyers offer focused expertise that generalist firms rarely match — combining knowledge of INTERPOL's procedural rules with practical experience in national extradition systems.
If you need legal advice on extradition from or to Poland, INTERPOL Red Notice removal, CCF deletion requests, preventive filings, or cross-border criminal defence strategy, contact Collegium of International Lawyers directly.